Chapter 11
Guiding preservice teachers in developing TPCK

I found this chapter very interesting and informational. I think the author has a deep understanding of what preservice teachers need and how everything (content, knowledge, content, and technology) is connected and integrated. There are many valid and critical points made in the chapter that I feel would make a difference in the field of education. I will go on to say, that from my own limited personal experience (5 years), from a novice to now, I myself, have made many changes, adaptations, and revisions. I know that teaching is a messy process that requires support, time, reflection, thinking, assessing, learning, creating, designing, evaluating, and much, much more. Like many complex and wicked problems, I feel there is not one “right” answer, but the author has presented some possible solutions. With teaching, there are some many factors and forces that are happening in a classroom, that I feel no one program can provide all the skills and tools needed to teach children. Teaching and learning is a complicated combination and intricate process that manifests itself differently for everyone involved and is constantly changing and evolving.
One idea I found interesting is that of preservice teachers in study groups, those made up of different content areas and school levels. I think this part is essential, speaking of my own learning, I have benefitted greatly from networking and collaborating with others. I do feel currently in this master program that more time to connect with others and share our knowledge, content, pedagogy, technology, etc, the better my chances are to improve as a teacher and student.
I did find the matrix diagrams very useful in this chapter as a way to frame, organize and clarify my thinking about my own unit. This chapter and much of the book has made me think about teaching and learning very differently than I had before and now, I am much more aware and cognizant of the outcomes, process, assessment and learning opportunities that I provide for the children in my classroom.
Another idea I liked was that of the research done with preservice teachers and students in Alaska. The fact that teachers and students learned together and integrated technology is wonderful. I think the results for all parties involved was extremely powerful and meaningful. I truly believe that meaningful and authentic learning is what preservice teachers and students need to meet goals and acquire knowledge. The most important implication from this study was the fact that teachers learned about students through teaching, which I feel naturally happens in my Kindergarten classroom everyday.
I wish there were simple solutions to achieve the highest standard of teaching and learning and that one program for preservice teachers exceptionally prepared them to teach the children of the twenty-first century, but unfortunately at this time
of complexity and many factors, knowledge and skills needed, it is unlikely. I believe we have the ability and power to change the field of education and with support, time, reflection, thinking, creating, assessing, designing, technology, and collaborating we can impact the children in our classroom.
As stated in the chapter, reflection is important when teaching, I strongly agree, but reflections are subjective and related to one’s personal experience, therefore creating a “wicked” problem. If given time to collaborate and network more reflections can be shared, data analyzed, predictions, and outcomes can be reached and exceeded where the result maybe in fact affecting teachers and students teaching and learning.
As simply said in the Chinese proverb “To teach is to learn” (227).